Thank you for revising that. I forgot mentioning it, and in fact I didn't care about policies about free software until now. I will from now on.
Sometimes I don't understand clearly what license should I state, and in that case, I simply didn't write it in the expression. I didn't think of nixpkgs/doc. I'll read that on doubt. I still have to add the license to 'zdoom'. Amike, Lluís. 2009/2/23 Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > Llus Batlle <[email protected]> writes: > >> + meta = { >> + homepage = http://www.fmod.org/; >> + description = "Programming library and toolkit for the creation and >> playback of interactive audio"; >> + }; > > This is apparently non-free software. Can you explicitly mark it as > such as per `doc/meta.xml'[*]? > > Thanks, > Ludo'. > > [*] Speaking of which, the term "unfree" proposed by Eelco in `meta.xml' > is not English, so I'd prefer "non-free". > _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
