> (BTW, merging this branch will blur revision history, which is > unpleasant. I would recommend against using git-svn(1) for merges, and > so does the man page, but I guess it's too late now.) It's never too late. Another branch could be forked before the merge was done. The merge could be done by using svn. Instead of fixing the conflicts again you could copy over the merge result from git..
However this problem will occur more often in the future ? Some month ago I thought it doesn't matter wether nix keeps using subversion. My mind has changed. I think it would be great if we could start listing pro / cons git vs subversion.. Why? I think there will be more and more branches in the future. I still can live with subversion. I'd like to know how others think about this. I don't want to force anything at the moment. About testing services: pierron, do you think you could make a short list of services and their status? I think some of us could test some services and verify that they still do work. Marc Weber _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
