In order to fix that I have to install additional packages on that machine... hmmm...
Maybe, it's indeed better to support stdenvNix. I will look into that now... Btw. I'm now testing on FreeBSD 8.0. I think it's also a good idea to update the FreeBSD machine. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Eelco Dolstra [mailto:[email protected]] Verzonden: wo 3-2-2010 22:19 Aan: [email protected]; Sander van der Burg - EWI Onderwerp: Re: [Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - 19795 - sandervanderburg - nixpkgs/branches/stdenv-updates/pkgs/stdenv/native Hi, Sander van der Burg wrote: > Author: sandervanderburg > Date: 2010-02-03 20:41:28 +0000 (Wed, 03 Feb 2010) > New Revision: 19795 > > You can view the changes in this commit at: > https://svn.nixos.org/viewvc/nix?rev=19795&view=rev > > Added: > nixpkgs/branches/stdenv-updates/pkgs/stdenv/native/derivealiases-freebsd.sh > Modified: > nixpkgs/branches/stdenv-updates/pkgs/stdenv/native/default.nix > > Log: > Added all necessary aliases to match the Linux stdenv as closely as possible > on FreeBSD Isn't it better to just add coreutils and so on to the stdenv on FreeBSD? (Basically, use stdenvNix on FreeBSD.) This change breaks in our own build farm: http://hydra.nixos.org/build/280266/nixlog/1/tail -- Eelco Dolstra | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
