Hello Sander, What are you replying to?
"Sander van der Burg - EWI" <[email protected]> writes: > What I need now is consensus about license identifiers. If this > consensus is ok to use, then I'll start modifying the incorrect > license attributes when I encounter them. Someone added a link to this page on the wiki: <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses>. The nice thing is that it contains short names for many licenses, so it could serve as a reference. > The only thing I don't know yet is what Hydra does when the > meta.license attribute is a list of strings instead of a list. Sometimes one wants an ‘and’ (e.g., GnuTLS is LGPLv2+ but the ‘gnutls-cli’ program is GPLv3+), sometimes an ‘or’ (software that is dual-licensed). And that’s for the simplest cases. :-) Thanks, Ludo’. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
