Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > "Yury G. Kudryashov" <[email protected]> writes: > >>> Yury G Kudryashov <[email protected]> writes: >>>> GnuPG tests fail without running gpg-agent >>> >>> Then it looks like a regression compared to 2.0.12. For GNU programs >>> “make check” alone should do the right thing, including starting >>> auxiliary programs if needed. Could you report it upstream? >> Already written to gnupg-devel mailing list. > > Cool, thanks. In that case, for packages I (co-)maintain at least, I > prefer if there’s a link to the discussion so we don’t lose track of > what’s going on. http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2010-April/025576.html Sorry that I haven't disscussed my changes with you before commiting them.
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
