On Saturday 10 July 2010 16:53:36 Marc Weber wrote: > > I can't come up with such a case. Examples? > > Yury G Kudryashov had another idea which tries to protect against > failures: sending output of configure script: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.nixos/4409
I don't think it's related in any way though. > > It is a reasonable safety check. The purpose is to fail due to assert if > > you have missing required dependencies, instead of having ./configure > > fail. > > I personally don't care enough. I wasn't hit by that problem yet > although I've been using NixOS as main system for quite a while now. > It could make sense though. I feel depressed about giving a final > statement on this list nowadays. So try to get feedback from other > community members - or send patches and hope that someone has time > to comment them. I don't really see a problem with this. You offered constructive criticism and suggestions. Others don't see this change affecting them in a bad way and seem to be ok with whatever is done... -- Evgeny _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
