Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:49:13PM +0400, Michael Raskin wrote: > Although Fossil comes with bug-tracking and wiki, when I sent the link it > was not what I had in mind as relevant in the talk. > > Some of the points I like of Fossil, then: > - It does not allow the kind of git history rewriting. Thus, I favour the > use of > more branches with full history keeping instead of "rebase -i; push". You can use pull (merge, not rebase); push instead. > > What I don't like much: > - Some operations can be done only through the web ui, which is both > thought as > a normal UI for local usage, and as a public web server. Then, tickets > can only be managed through the web ui. "fossil ui" starts the server > and tells firefox to open that page, in that single command. I'd like a > full featured command line. +1 > - I still have to see migration scripts other than CVS to Fossil. +1 > > Urkud talked about the linking between different projects, but I don't > know what was he thinking about. Urkud, can you explain what you had in > mind? Do you mean the git ability to pull from a repository *only* commits > for a single branch, instead of pulling all? It was Evgeny (Phreedom) who was talking about linking between different projects. I think that he is talking about > > Related to 'git', I've found this days how difficult it is to cross-build > perl, and I feel it difficult for me to accept more things perl-based, > having other not-worse solutions around. :) You need perl only for git-svn and a few other scripts. All the main commands are in C or bash. > > Regards, > Lluís.
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
