> > Well, not a big deal, I just wanted the situation to be clear. >for what it's worth, I would have liked it much better if you would have >cleared up the situation a little earlier, and not just after I had >thoroughly misunderstood it. As you said yourself, the debate you >engaged me in would have been very strange if you would have been a >first-time user of Nix. Yet, throughout the entire debate, that was >exactly what I had to assume since you gave no indication whatsoever who >you are. If you would have revealed your identity a little earlier, you >could have easily avoided offending me the way you did.
Sorry for causing misunderstanding. I use the same configuration for a few months, and after posting http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.nixos/5333 and other thread-starting change announcements with exact same configuration, I assumed this to be my identity configuration status-quo. I also over-relied on my being listed in stdenv.lib.maintainers; all this caused me just not to care. In short, I am sorry that my paying too little attention to the way my messages look caused them to be offending. Michael Raskin. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
