> By the way, do you know how much hydra waits because of waiting for > dependencies? I think it shouldn't be too difficult to always find > something else to build on hydra, but e. g. for package maintainers Its not about keeping Hydra busy. Its about being able to deliver patched versions fast if there is a use case (eg security patches) In production systems it may matter whether you're able to deploy much faster. However using faster / more machines would have more effect than separating check phases ? Currently its not most important to me.
> Using stats from hydra, nix could one day estimate the build time > automatically. I don't see this as a priority now, as the usual users > are IMHO going to prefer binaries from hydra in most cases. If you use sources hydra uses you're fine. If you use a patched nixpgks .. Marc Weber _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
