Hi. On 24 July 2011 18:11, Sander van der Burg - EWI <[email protected]> wrote: > Convenience, hmm... Personally, I find it confusing if the name of this > emulator would be: visual_boy_advance or something like that, while the > package on the internet is named: VisualBoyAdvance . Similarly, a lot of Java > packages use naming conventions like this.
I agree on this point - I respect the convention but I find it unnecessary. I think most distributions tend to stick to upstream naming conventions. There might be some minor portability problems with CamelCase filenames (I'm not sure), as some OSs are case insensitive. But on the whole I certainly wouldn't mind to drop this restriction, or are there any other reasons for it? Vlada _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
