>I disagree. What useful information do most of these communicate? E.g. if a >mkdir succeeds, why do I have to be informed about it? It's only interesting >if >it fails. > >Rob actually just suggested to make the unpackPhase less verbose, i.e. drop the >"-v" flag in "tar" and "cp". But maybe that should be optional.
OK, dropping -v both for tar and mkdir is a good idea. But I always thought that -v for tar was deliberate (and mkdir -v is less relative verbosity than tar -v). mkdir -v is a balance improvement after that. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
