On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Eelco Dolstra <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/03/12 13:58, Mathijs Kwik wrote: > >> Log: >> all-interfaces event > > It's great to get rid of the special casing of gw6c. But some comments: > > I don't like the name "all-interfaces", which suggests that all interfaces are > up. As far as I can tell, that's not the case (e.g. for interfaces configured > using DHCP). A nicer name would be "networking", i.e. jobs can depend on > "started networking".
sure, sounds better > > I also don't see what "interfaceJobs" is for. Can't jobs like gw6c just have > a > "starting networking" dependency (which causes them to become dependencies of > the "networking" job)? ah, indeed, that's a lot easier. I will change these. > > -- > Eelco Dolstra | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/ _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
