On 3/8/12 9:21 AM, Eelco Dolstra wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/03/12 15:20, Shea Levy wrote: > >>> If it was caused by a build-time impurity, then simply using the binaries >>> from >>> the Nixpkgs channel should fix this. As far as I can tell the Glibc binary >>> in >>> our channel doesn't reference /lib64. >> This seems like an incomplete approach to this problem. > I didn't mean to imply that it was. Impurities should be fixed, of course. >
As a stop-gap, maybe we could patchelf gencat? _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
