Hi, On 05/04/12 18:57, Shea Levy wrote:
> Shouldn't this be a concern of nixpkgs? It's Nix's job to ensure a consistent build environment (as much as possible). > What happens when our > kernel-headers are updated to 3.x? Why would that be a problem? > And is nix itself not expected to > work on 2.4 kernels? This change shouldn't have any effect on Linux 2.4 (and I doubt that Nixpkgs still works on 2.4). -- Eelco Dolstra | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/ _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
