Hi, On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:02, Rickard Nilsson <[email protected]> wrote: > What all this boils down to, is that I think the way NixOS mounts network > filesystems is a bit messy. It first tries to mount all filesystems, and > then when it get an ip-up event, it makes a new attempt which should cause > network filesystems to be mounted. However, wouldn't it be better to > separate local and network filesystems into two different stages? After > udev, mount all local paths. After ip-up, start the NFS daemons and mount > all remote paths. What do you think? I will try to experiment with this > and see how it works out. If it fails, I must at least find a way to not > start idmapd until ip-up.
The problem I see is that we don't have strong dependencies for task / services and upstart, or our usage of upstart does not provide a good solution. You can try and hope that this would not damage anybody else systems but this sounds like a dead-cause to me unless we can rely systemd like resources / services management. -- Nicolas Pierron http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolasbpierron - http://nbp.name/ _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
