On 08/24/2013 02:40 PM, Peter Simons wrote:
are there any issues left that would prevent us from merging the stdenv-updates branch? As far as I can tell, the branch is in pretty good shape.
Currently I see the biggest problems in the fact that gcc builds often fail with some std::?stream linking error.
http://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/stdenv/gcc48.x86_64-linux http://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/stdenv/stdenv.x86_64-darwinThe fact that stdenv builds despite that gcc48 doesn't is a complete mystery to me (on x86_64-linux).
There are also some other very strange linking regressions against master, e.g.:
http://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/stdenv/popplerQt4.x86_64-linux http://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/stdenv/amule.x86_64-linux (I've seen some others IIRC.)I checked the poppler case, and the requested libraries *are* found by ldd (as they are on RPATH), and interestingly they're reported as unused by ldd -u.
_________x-updates is IMHO mergeable. Mesa-9.2.0 update would be easy [mesa], but I forgot that .1 is always first "stable" release. 9.2.1 can be expected in about a month. Those who want the radeonsi driver or LLVM-accelerated R600-based drivers are encouraged to test. There's probably not a significant benefit for others, except if you're accidentally suffering from some bug it fixes.
I suppose we don't need to rush with x-updates and want to wait for stdenv-updates (merge both at once)?
[mesa] https://github.com/vcunat/nixpkgs/commits/vlada/mesa (topgit-managed) Vlada
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
