On 10/08/2013 10:37 AM, Pascal Wittmann wrote:> On 10/08/2013 11:24 AM, Daniel Hlynskyi wrote: >> Hello. There is a convention to convert haskell packages names to camelCase >> when they contain dashes. But Nix now can dashes. >> So what convention should I use when submitting new haskell packages to >> `nixpkgs`? > > The nixpkgs manual says: > > "Dashes in the package name should be changed to underscores in variable > names, rather than to camel case — e.g., module_init_tools instead of > moduleInitTools." > http://nixos.org/nixpkgs/manual/#idp365984
That might be the case for nixpkgs in general, but it's not the case for Haskell packaging. Daniel, I would suggest carrying on with camelCase for Haskell packages for consistency. If we want to use dash naming and be equivalent to Hackage, then I think this should be done in a single commit. - ocharles
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
