Hi, On 09/12/13 23:56, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
> I think these branches should just be merged and we shouldn't allow such > long-running branches to spring up again. Yes, I agree completely. In particular the stdenv branch should go because it always tends to take ages to merge. Much better to use a short-lived branch for specific changes. For example, I've put the upgrade to Glibc 2.18 in its own branch (glibc-2.18). This allows Hydra to show exactly what packages are broken because of Glibc 2.18: http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/glibc-2.18/latest-eval?compare=trunk-combined > What would others prefer? Am I alone in perceiving these issues? I agree with pretty much everything you said :-) -- Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. | http://nixos.org/~eelco/ _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
