Yes, this is a variant on my "conservative" solution and will break
anything that uses pkgs.lib on the hot path to evaluating
config.nixpkgs. But as Eelco has said he may be willing to take that
hit, something along those lines will probably be the ultimate outcome
here.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:45:11PM +0000, Marc Weber wrote:
> Why can't we introduce a config.args which gets merged into the attrs to
> be passed?
>
> This would not break pretty much everything still make it possible to
> pass additional args in two ways, via {, ...} and config.args.
>
> This would be kind of mixing "traditional approach" with "use config"
> only - by allowing both ?
>
> Marc Weber
> _______________________________________________
> nix-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
