Just after sending the previous letter I've discovered that setting outputs to ["out"] in the manual-config.nix [1] hides the error. Still I don't know if it works correctly or not.
Regards, Sergey [1] - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/os-specific/linux/kernel/manual-config.nix#L77 2014-03-07 12:17 GMT+04:00 Sergey Mironov <[email protected]>: > Hi. I am trying to build my own minimalistic kernel with `buildLinux' > defined in kernel/manual-config.nix. I've written the wrapper > expression as follows: > > # linuxHandMade.nix > { stdenv, fetchurl, buildLinux } : > > buildLinux rec { > > version = "3.10.28"; > > src = fetchurl { > url = "mirror://kernel/linux/kernel/v3.x/linux-${version}.tar.xz"; > sha256 = "1blzvr3qywi8wxgl28zsn5djwgvw70yh3i6qjh2sz3zk9gnpd6mq"; > }; > > configfile = ./linux-config; > > allowImportFromDerivation = true; > } > > where ./linux-config is the .config I have built manually by unpacking > kernel sources and doing 'make menuconfig'. Everything was OK until I > disabled the loadable modules support. The ./linux-config now contains > "# CONFIG_MODULES is not set" and kernel/manual-config.nix doesn't > work. The error is quite obscure: > > $ nix-build econat.nix -A linuxHandMade --show-trace > error: while evaluating `callPackageWith' at > `/home/grwlf/proj/nixpkgs-econat/lib/customisation.nix:95:35': > while evaluating `makeOverridable' at > `/home/grwlf/proj/nixpkgs-econat/lib/customisation.nix:56:24': > while evaluating an anonymous function at > `/home/grwlf/proj/nixpkgs-econat/econat/apps/kernel.nix:1:1': > while evaluating an anonymous function at > `/home/grwlf/proj/nixpkgs-econat/pkgs/os-specific/linux/kernel/manual-config.nix:13:4': > while evaluating `mkDerivation' at > `/home/grwlf/proj/nixpkgs-econat/pkgs/stdenv/generic/default.nix:55:24': > while evaluating `addPassthru' at > `/home/grwlf/proj/nixpkgs-econat/lib/customisation.nix:100:22': > while evaluating an anonymous function at > `/nix/store/mf69pq5r5948h2q4wj4zfx69rn6zcfk4-nix-1.6.1/share/nix/corepkgs/derivation.nix:4:1': > value is null while a list was expected > > I think I've already entered the purely-tested areas of Nixos but > still could anybody give me a clue of what may go wrong? > > Regards, > Sergey _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
