A branch suggests merging, but really there will be tons of merges *into* to branch and only ever be cherry-picks *out of* the branch, which IMO negates most of the benefits of having it be in the same repo.
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 10:17:45AM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 03:46:20PM -0400, Shea Levy wrote: > > Thoughts on the idea? Any idea for a name for the repo? Eelco, would you > > be able to make the repo if you think this is a good approach? > > Is a whole other repo really necessary? Why not just a branch of > nixpkgs? > > Matthew > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev