> > Obviously systemd would then have to not do things that udev etc are > already doing... Just running services, opening sockets, handling cgroups... >
I doubt systemd can do this. First of all, with the new kernel cgroups interface only PID 1 can manage cgroups (on the kernel level). Then, to properly handle services (i.e. processes) systemd has to be PID 1, right? Because otherwise it won't be able to track dead processes and all this stuff.
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
