Is this thread dead? I'd really love to know what's going on here.
-- Кирилл Елагин On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Kirill Elagin <kirela...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just thought that minimising the testcase might be a good idea. > Simply having > > ~~~~ > packageOverrides = pkgs_: with pkgs_; { > testgcc2 = pkgs_.gcc; > }; > ~~~~ > > is already enough to reproduce the issue: > > ~~~~ > % nix-instantiate '<nixpkgs>' -A gcc > warning: you did not specify `--add-root'; the result might be removed by > the garbage collector > /nix/store/993glmz6hxbld0ry81jwv7c3z7cgaz68-gcc-wrapper-4.8.2.drv > > % nix-instantiate '<nixpkgs>' -A testgcc2 > warning: you did not specify `--add-root'; the result might be removed by > the garbage collector > /nix/store/41nacbfpr8jzsk3k03jjlqb2r2xis5gf-gcc-wrapper-4.8.2.drv > ~~~~ > > > -- > Кирилл Елагин > > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Kirill Elagin <kirela...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Here is what I see (this is a diff of references of gccWrapper for gcc >> vs. testgcc): >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> /nix/store/x0ml8lx5220diw4iplia8ry240smb4vl-add-flags >> /nix/store/2gff5jccdfr4z21yxnfrjjwcq3vpr1wi-bash-4.2-p45.drv >> +/nix/store/cz26wrhr8ddk09yffy67xjsaz339byj2-bash-4.2-p45.drv <------ >> second bash, WUT?? >> -/nix/store/yykyb9sf6axlm78f4apk0mabicnv8mnr-binutils-2.23.1.drv >> +/nix/store/7z26jxbwkc5hx9gwrj47dhcpfxwg5b67-binutils-2.23.1.drv >> -/nix/store/xirq1m6mi5lw61v33mnv3j13hy9bwnwx-bootstrap-tools.drv >> <------ gone >> /nix/store/gj4rbkipgzw4ss82my8m6lnaxdm85b3i-builder.sh >> -/nix/store/qi7wdh1qyvd58ip61dn8d58v2awagbhj-coreutils-8.21.drv >> +/nix/store/q8ng53dv1lccmg4a2jcj8540ifszi65j-coreutils-8.21.drv >> -/nix/store/8hwk0axdnf9c2d61fzs3cn54m2d543y9-gcc-4.8.2.drv >> +/nix/store/5ncp7pw6nc3yhxny8mfks17jngxz9qns-gcc-4.8.2.drv >> /nix/store/5w5cjjrdyhn5a1ph7bia4z05gbar1fpm-gcc-wrapper.sh >> -/nix/store/cn5p5k04np1v3vpqimgx2f8012wv2ljw-glibc-2.19.drv >> +/nix/store/38aab2xbj5vpk09c218rdz4jy8xfgjs9-glibc-2.19.drv >> /nix/store/rjs81x48ala9iafn8nki9xklzihd69as-gnatlink-wrapper.sh >> /nix/store/jh6njrxyaxdsh9i2gfv543bkbamp5ccm-gnat-wrapper.sh >> /nix/store/z6075iacwfl1bmsmg2q712ccvj370zp0-ld-solaris-wrapper.sh >> /nix/store/jj68gnbzcsyr59p0074zh5znx54022w4-ld-wrapper.sh >> /nix/store/v6na0qqb5jcas6av4w7ialplw8h0rwl9-setup-hook.sh >> -/nix/store/884c7h4gi7xf2vpyfp1lybqxvkf644m8-stdenv-linux-boot.drv >> +/nix/store/kyai48rvwcaynnp0qywcg89yp0l5dzrq-stdenv.drv >> /nix/store/zcw8i26jh4gvyq74g2g9w6ixh7rprph0-utils.sh >> +/nix/store/f3ssylga2wkh9k3bydmaajzz6wifms2w-zlib-1.2.8.drv <------- >> hey, who are you? >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> I didn't know how to diff .drvs either, so I used a command like >> >> ~~~~ >> nix-store -q --references <path_to_drv_in_store> | sort -t - -k2 >> ~~~~ >> >> to produce a list of references sorted by derivation name. Then `diff` >> plus some hand-juggling to make the diff look nicer. >> >> >> -- >> Кирилл Елагин >> >> >> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Pavel Chuprikov <pschupri...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I didn't know how to diff .drv, so I converted them using ad-hoc >>> python script. >>> >>> -- >>> Pavel >>> >>> >>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Pavel Chuprikov <pschupri...@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've compared derivations of gcc-wrappers and here what I got: >>>> >>>> pkgs.gcc vs pkgs.testgcc >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>> 1c1 >>>> < ('out', >>>> '/nix/store/agf8fk4xj2aqr3jccfcypqsmvkz3smn8-gcc-wrapper-4.8.2', '', '') >>>> --- >>>> > ('out', >>>> '/nix/store/nxzf150liimxqdz0f105kg5vsbcd9c75-gcc-wrapper-4.8.2', '', '') >>>> 3,8c3,9 >>>> < ('/nix/store/884c7h4gi7xf2vpyfp1lybqxvkf644m8-stdenv-linux-boot.drv', >>>> ['out']) >>>> < ('/nix/store/8hwk0axdnf9c2d61fzs3cn54m2d543y9-gcc-4.8.2.drv', ['out']) >>>> < ('/nix/store/cn5p5k04np1v3vpqimgx2f8012wv2ljw-glibc-2.19.drv', >>>> ['out']) >>>> < ('/nix/store/qi7wdh1qyvd58ip61dn8d58v2awagbhj-coreutils-8.21.drv', >>>> ['out']) >>>> < ('/nix/store/xirq1m6mi5lw61v33mnv3j13hy9bwnwx-bootstrap-tools.drv', >>>> ['out']) >>>> < ('/nix/store/yykyb9sf6axlm78f4apk0mabicnv8mnr-binutils-2.23.1.drv', >>>> ['out']) >>>> --- >>>> > ('/nix/store/38aab2xbj5vpk09c218rdz4jy8xfgjs9-glibc-2.19.drv', >>>> ['out']) >>>> > ('/nix/store/5ncp7pw6nc3yhxny8mfks17jngxz9qns-gcc-4.8.2.drv', ['out']) >>>> > ('/nix/store/7z26jxbwkc5hx9gwrj47dhcpfxwg5b67-binutils-2.23.1.drv', >>>> ['out']) >>>> > ('/nix/store/cz26wrhr8ddk09yffy67xjsaz339byj2-bash-4.2-p45.drv', >>>> ['out']) >>>> > ('/nix/store/f3ssylga2wkh9k3bydmaajzz6wifms2w-zlib-1.2.8.drv', >>>> ['out']) >>>> > ('/nix/store/kyai48rvwcaynnp0qywcg89yp0l5dzrq-stdenv.drv', ['out']) >>>> > ('/nix/store/q8ng53dv1lccmg4a2jcj8540ifszi65j-coreutils-8.21.drv', >>>> ['out']) >>>> 19c20 >>>> < /nix/store/c8lg3m5mr246fvlx6xsrxa0sykv4l9pg-bootstrap-tools/bin/sh >>>> --- >>>> > /nix/store/p0vd3ydvxplbpjffkpblwj5dahcmp9ri-bash-4.2-p45/bin/bash >>>> 23c24 >>>> < ('binutils', >>>> '/nix/store/xjvdpqgn2kd4rg0k30z020kxylvlbpx0-binutils-2.23.1') >>>> --- >>>> > ('binutils', >>>> '/nix/store/lc4961ic7mc3bsl7njhzm4qxawhvj2bq-binutils-2.23.1') >>>> 25,26c26,27 >>>> < ('builder', >>>> '/nix/store/c8lg3m5mr246fvlx6xsrxa0sykv4l9pg-bootstrap-tools/bin/sh') >>>> < ('coreutils', >>>> '/nix/store/xdswdgz11w9lm9n9bzb6spl7dj45s2x2-coreutils-8.21') >>>> --- >>>> > ('builder', >>>> '/nix/store/p0vd3ydvxplbpjffkpblwj5dahcmp9ri-bash-4.2-p45/bin/bash') >>>> > ('coreutils', >>>> '/nix/store/w15x8z4g200r6syxnc2wyq93gizbg7dv-coreutils-8.21') >>>> 28c29 >>>> < ('gcc', '/nix/store/9fb027n5a2lf9qwpb98v77iycqq552pf-gcc-4.8.2') >>>> --- >>>> > ('gcc', '/nix/store/1rymlfk7y0pjwmhh6ngp0azw3173v5a0-gcc-4.8.2') >>>> 39c40 >>>> < ('libc', '/nix/store/pdskwizjw8ar31hql2wjnnx6g0s6xc50-glibc-2.19') >>>> --- >>>> > ('libc', '/nix/store/gbymvr6n95scxf6mzkgfzywydsjskmsm-glibc-2.19') >>>> 45c46 >>>> < ('out', >>>> '/nix/store/agf8fk4xj2aqr3jccfcypqsmvkz3smn8-gcc-wrapper-4.8.2') >>>> --- >>>> > ('out', >>>> '/nix/store/nxzf150liimxqdz0f105kg5vsbcd9c75-gcc-wrapper-4.8.2') >>>> 50,51c51,52 >>>> < ('shell', >>>> '/nix/store/p0vd3ydvxplbpjffkpblwj5dahcmp9ri-bash-4.2-p45/bin/bash') >>>> < ('stdenv', >>>> '/nix/store/hbw5c0hqrg3mv7sa2aic7s9yvrcwjixz-stdenv-linux-boot') >>>> --- >>>> > ('shell', >>>> '/nix/store/4s36p56jq79zhnyplrhqjscaqbw0x3c8-bash-4.2-p45/bin/bash') >>>> > ('stdenv', '/nix/store/rq16hrf7gy426a6lcnf6pa9746sxnbgc-stdenv') >>>> 55c56 >>>> < ('zlib', '') >>>> --- >>>> > ('zlib', '/nix/store/kksws74v0v0jf6dl6f5fhw24dygzairc-zlib-1.2.8') >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>> >>>> I noticed that a few inputs are different in their names ('builder', >>>> 'stdenv', 'zlib'). >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Pavel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Kirill Elagin <kirela...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>> >>>>> Just for the record: this issue is not due to Pavel's >>>>> misconfiguration, I can confirm the behaviour he described. >>>>> >>>>> In my case it is >>>>> >>>>> ~~~~~ >>>>> % nix-env --dry-run -iA nixos.pkgs.gcc >>>>> (dry run; not doing anything) >>>>> installing `gcc-wrapper-4.8.2' >>>>> % readlink -f $(which gcc) >>>>> /nix/store/agf8fk4xj2aqr3jccfcypqsmvkz3smn8-gcc-wrapper-4.8.2/bin/gcc >>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>> >>>>> (I don't know how to force `nix-env` to print computed hash of an >>>>> already present package.) >>>>> >>>>> ~~~~~~ >>>>> % nix-env --dry-run -iA nixos.pkgs.testgcc >>>>> (dry run; not doing anything) >>>>> installing `testgcc' >>>>> >>>>> these derivations will be built: >>>>> /nix/store/41nacbfpr8jzsk3k03jjlqb2r2xis5gf-gcc-wrapper-4.8.2.drv >>>>> /nix/store/7z26jxbwkc5hx9gwrj47dhcpfxwg5b67-binutils-2.23.1.drv >>>>> /nix/store/di54xrm0pkrs67fv61g7j53qhsm8vm55-testgcc.drv >>>>> these paths will be fetched (13.86 MiB download, 79.74 MiB unpacked): >>>>> /nix/store/1rymlfk7y0pjwmhh6ngp0azw3173v5a0-gcc-4.8.2 >>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>> >>>>> So please note that hashes don't much not only for `gcc-wrapper` and >>>>> `binutils`, but also for `gcc` and, >>>>> strangely enough, that another `gcc` is available on the channel! >>>>> >>>>> ~~~~~~~~ >>>>> % nix-store -q -R $(which gcc) | grep gcc-4 >>>>> /nix/store/9fb027n5a2lf9qwpb98v77iycqq552pf-gcc-4.8.2 >>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>> >>>>> Probably, comparing inputs of `gcc`'s with given hashes might shed >>>>> some light on the case. >>>>> >>>>> Answering your questions: >>>>> >>>>> ~~~~~~ >>>>> % nix-env -qaP | grep testgcc >>>>> nixos.pkgs.testgcc >>>>> testgcc >>>>> ~~~~~~~ >>>>> >>>>> And removing `~/.nix-defexpr/channels` doesn't change anything. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Кирилл Елагин >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Peter Simons <sim...@cryp.to> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Pavel, >>>>>> >>>>>> could you please restore original ~/.nixpkgs/config.nix file you were >>>>>> using when you started this thread and run: >>>>>> >>>>>> $ nix-env -qaP \* | grep testgcc >>>>>> >>>>>> What is the output of that command? >>>>>> >>>>>> Afterwards, please delete the symlink ~/.nix-defexpr/channels (so that >>>>>> ~/.nix-defexpr/channels_root is the only remaining entry in that >>>>>> directory). Then, please run: >>>>>> >>>>>> $ nix-env -iA nixos.pkgs.testgcc --dry-run >>>>>> >>>>>> Does the command still try to re-build gcc, glibc, etc.? >>>>>> >>>>>> Take care, >>>>>> Peter >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> nix-dev mailing list >>>>>> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl >>>>>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> nix-dev mailing list >>>>> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl >>>>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev