On 08/17/2014 11:18 PM, Raahul Kumar wrote: > I'm interested in the Haskell failures. Anyone have a list of the most > important ones, due to reverse Hackage dependencies? > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> On 08/12/2014 01:26 PM, Rok Garbas wrote: >>> Quoting Domen Kožar (2014-08-12 13:31:27) >>>> Just to let everyone know, I'll have time to work on Python failures >> during the >>>> sprint in Ljubljana, but unfortunately not before that. >>>> >>>> Good work though! >>> >>> same here. we'll make sure python stuff gets fixed at ljubljana sprint. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Rok Garbas - http://www.garbas.si >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nix-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >>> >> >> Will this involve splitting up python-packages.nix into more manageable >> pieces or will you just focus on getting things building/marking as broken? >> >> Problem with Python packages is that it's all too easy to ‘build’ them >> but only once you run them do the problems come up (missing depends, >> incompatible interpreter version, …). I can only wish you luck. >> >> -- >> Mateusz K. >> _______________________________________________ >> nix-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >> >
You can get a good idea from looking at Peter Simon's Hydra job: http://hydra.cryp.to/eval/8919 -- Mateusz K. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
