On 22/08/2014 17:01, Nicolas Pierron wrote: > Are we only talking about stage-1-init.sh [1] or I am missing something else? Yes only that, the initrd script. Plus some slight change in nixos modules (e.g. fileSystems).
> It sounds to me that the stage-1 looks more like the activation script > than anything else, even if I accept that we might want additional > options which might be easier with systemd, Currently it is an activation script, with all the culprits you have from an activation script: mainly having fixed hooks without dependencies in between. I'm proposing systemd in initrd for the same reason an init system with dependencies and services is needed on the host. Because nowadays it's no more about simply mounting a local file system. > I do not see any reason > for not having a trivial backend for jobs-entries which just assert > that these additional options are not used. Can you rephrase? I didn't understand, sorry. Best regards, _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
