Ah, I hadn't heard of that. They have somewhat different purposes.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:14:00PM +0200, Luca Bruno wrote: > Wondering about the clash about your nix-exec, and this nix-exec: > http://datakurre.pandala.org/2014/09/nix-expressions-as-executable-commands.html > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Shea Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm proud to announce the release of nix-exec 2.0.0. From the release > > notes [1]: > > > > * unsafe-perform-io now just takes an IO value directly, instead of > > expecting a function matching the top-level entry point signature > > * nix-exec's compile-time settings are now accessible from lib instead > > of as global symbols > > * nix-exec's lib now has a fetchgit builtin that caches repositories and > > checkouts. With this, a nix-exec script can now be usefully used > > without even a nixpkgs checkout in the caller's NIX_PATH. > > > > Happy hacking! > > > > ~Shea > > > > [1]: https://github.com/shlevy/nix-exec/releases/tag/v2.0.0 > > _______________________________________________ > > nix-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > > > > > > -- > www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
