Doesn't that usually apply to big things that most people skip reviewing due to contributor's good standing and "tl;dr" (though it shouldn't be like this, too... '^_^)?
On 01/20/2015 01:02 AM, Matthias Beyer wrote: > On 20-01-2015 01:00:30, Michael Raskin wrote: >>>> Nevertheless I want to go though my packages and do version bumps >>>> in the near future, and I believe this (and things like grammar >>>> fixes) is kind of patches that should be applied more directly than >>>> usual, to bother less contributors so that they can focus on >>>> more non-trivial things. >>> What keeps you from having a "version-bumping" branch where all your >>> patches are in and open just one PR for all the patches at once? >> Pity towards me, who will read a PR of unrelated changes and wonder what >> saced animal have I crossed in my previous life? >> > Have you ever looked how kernel maintainers do their work? For example > greg-kh with his staging-next branch? Do you think someone actually > goes through these patches except gregkh himself? ;-) > -- Nikolay. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
