Hi!

On 13-02-2015 11:23:07, Wout Mertens wrote:
> I'd start by finding out what is slow. The bash completion reads a bunch of
> files iirc, so copy the package and insert time measurements.

I know, it reads the whole completion stuff, right? Maybe we should
make this part more modular, so one can include what's required and
exclude what's not.

> 
> Also, you could upgrade to SSD for your root disk...
> 

I _have_ an SSD for my root disk! And an octocore processor and 16GB
Ram. It takes too long anyways!

> Also, maybe zsh is faster?
> 

Sorry, but I won't switch shell as long as there is a way to improve
things!

> On Tue Feb 10 2015 at 10:21:46 PM Matthias Beyer <m...@beyermatthias.de>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > we already had this on this ML, but the question which was posted (not
> > by me, btw) got no answer.
> >
> > I can't live withou bash completion. But using it makes bash awefully
> > slow at startup. Is there a way to enhance this situation?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> > Kind regards,
> > Matthias Beyer
> >
> > Proudly sent with mutt.
> > Happily signed with gnupg.
> > _______________________________________________
> > nix-dev mailing list
> > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
> > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
> >

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Kind regards,
Matthias Beyer

Proudly sent with mutt.
Happily signed with gnupg.

Attachment: pgptaz1q6frD_.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Reply via email to