On 18-02-2015 22:20:21, Vladimír Čunát wrote: > On 02/18/2015 09:51 AM, Nathan Bijnens wrote: > > My vote is to remove merged branches without historical significance > > (version 0.5 is a keeper, like upstart), and then any branches that > > got their last push before August 2014 are renamed to attic/... > > > >First make a fork with all history. Afterwards I like Wout's suggestion. > > Removing merged branches doesn't destroy history. > BTW, historically significant versions that aren't meant to be changed > anymore might better be converted to tags.
+1 ! -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Kind regards, Matthias Beyer Proudly sent with mutt. Happily signed with gnupg.
pgpYydW9UY3nv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
