Thanks. Gonna do something.
2015-02-23 23:21 GMT+03:00 Kirill Elagin <kirela...@gmail.com>: > It might even be a good idea to send this patch to Dyre upstream. I doubt > they really want to use GHC path stored during compilation for _dynamic_ > reconfiguration. > > On Mon Feb 23 2015 at 0:18:58 Kirill Elagin <kirela...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Well, the author of the issue I pointed out is correct in saying that >> they use Dyre which in turn uses ghc-paths. I checked ghc-paths and I >> believe what they do is store the path to GHC _they were compiled with_. >> >> So errr... Looks like we are stuck in a loop. I guess your best bet is to >> patch Dyre not to use ghc-paths. >> >> On Mon Feb 23 2015 at 23:59:51 Arseniy Seroka <ars.ser...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> 2015-02-23 22:55 GMT+03:00 Kirill Elagin <kirela...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Does XMonad work in your case? >>>> Can you import `System.Taffybar` in `ghci`? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, xmonad works and I can import `System.Taffybar` in ghci. >>> >>> >>> Might it be that, unlike XMonad, they do something more complicated to >>>> invoke GHC? I didn’t check the source, but looks like they do. >>>> Are you running this on a non-NixOS distro? In that case, the issue >>>> <https://github.com/simonmar/ghc-paths/issues/4> probably explains >>>> what’s going >>>> >>> >>> I'm using Nixos. >>> That's what they are doing. [1] >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/travitch/taffybar/blob/master/src/System/ >>> Taffybar.hs#L204 >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sincerely, >>> Arseniy Seroka >>> >> -- Sincerely, Arseniy Seroka
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
