I think a lot of packages rely on bashism, it's not only a matter of our scripts. Changing to something else will bring more problems than anything else. Also the fact that bash sees more security vulnerabilities it's because it's extremely more adopted than others, which doesn't mean others are more secure.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Michael Raskin <[email protected]> wrote: > >If we're replacing bash we might as well go all the way... > > > >Have we made any progress rewriting systemd in csh? > > All the ways is at least Guile-as-a-shell, anf I guess we should just > admit that Guix with its dmd is the proper way forward? > > I must admit that I don't like your defeatist attitude of J being > insuitable to implement a Linux init system. > > > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > -- NixOS Linux <http://nixos.org>
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
