I think we're ready to merge staging. Any objections? Current staging build failures are mostly because of cached kerberos failures.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Domen Kožar <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd just like to be clear: (everyone) please help us stabilize staging and > let's not touch stdenv unless necessary until we merge current staging into > master > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Domen Kožar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm trying to fix staging tests, they are quite broken and failing (kde4, >> installer, gnome3) >> >> See http://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1192494#tabs-still-fail >> >> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Luca Bruno <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 05/05/2015 13:14, Vladimír Čunát wrote: >>> > On 05/03/2015 01:25 PM, Luca Bruno wrote: >>> >> Because binaries of built staging are available only for that 7f9ccc6 >>> >> commit, I will merge exactly this commit and not current staging. I >>> >> think that commit is quite good, it has few build errors. If anybody >>> >> does not agree with this merge, please reply. >>> > The failure numbers look relatively good on 7f9ccc6, although I think >>> > there might be regressions in hundreds of packages (against master). >>> > Additionally, on darwin, trousers fail, which might create hundreds of >>> > failures (other platforms probably finished building). >>> > >>> > Staging development seems a bit too wild to me during the last few >>> > weeks; overloaded Hydra only makes it worse, as the problems are often >>> > detected days after being pushed. >>> Domen offered to fix staging failures. Hopefully that will not delay >>> staging merge by another month. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nix-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
