On 29-10-2015 13:28:10, Erik Rybakken wrote: > > One aspect of using IPFS, is that in addition to the nix store, one also > have the IPFS store. These two stores have a similar functionality. How > will we avoid duplication? Should we just use one store for both nix and > IPFS? >
The IPFS-thing would be a channel with a binary cache, not a /nix/store! -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Kind regards, Matthias Beyer Proudly sent with mutt. Happily signed with gnupg.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
