Is there a document that explains the rationale behind keeping a separate staging area ? I don't understand nixos fully and it looks like it would be more work than keeping the unstable channel to master.
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 19:49 Anderson Torres <[email protected]> wrote: > 2015-11-08 17:01 GMT-02:00 William Kennington <[email protected]>: > > Systemd 227 has been buggy at shutdown / restart for me, sometimes > failing > > to unmount some if the mount points. It doesn't happen on every restart > so > > ill have to see if i can find the cause. Just be careful rebooting remote > > machines. > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:59 AM Rok Garbas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Quoting Luca Bruno (2015-11-07 14:42:02) > >> > So we're back to the problem where staging is starting to diverge a > lot. > >> > Staging has not been merged since a couple of months at least. > >> > > >> > Is it possible to stop making big changes unless they are really > needed > >> > to fix > >> > the staging build? > >> > > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> are there any big blockers that need attention before we merge staging > to > >> master? > >> > >> from what have tested it works for my services. and i would love to get > >> systemd > >> 227 :) > > And I would love to get rid of it :) Maybe I need to study some more... > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Rok Garbas - http://www.garbas.si > >> _______________________________________________ > >> nix-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > nix-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
