For your information, I modified our list of labels, and kept a few old one as they do not map directly to any label of the new set.
Thanks for the link, now I recall reading this on the mailing list, I think have a target system makes sense, as well as having a package-class. On the other hand, I think I should to continue to do some triage every few days to see what are the pain points, and improve one step at a time. I invite other contributors to join me on this triaging effort, such that this system is not only made for me. On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Rok Garbas <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Vladimír Čunát (2015-11-22 16:16:10) >> For reference, we had a short but closely related discussion about half >> a year ago: >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/2015-March/016549.html >> >> Since then the rate of issues and PRs increased a bit, but their >> structure hasn't changed significantly, I believe. >> > > Tnx Vladimir, I guess we need to document some of this to not forget in the > future. > > > -- > Rok Garbas - http://www.garbas.si > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > -- Nicolas Pierron http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolasbpierron - http://nbp.name/ _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
