>A web-of-trust type approach is what I have previously heard discussed. In >the context of such an approach, I have three things to say in support of >my proposal.
>3. In those first two points, I claim some advantage relative to a >web-of-trust style approach. However, both ideas are fully compatible. >Precisely because my suggestion makes no changes to the current trust >model, it would be just as easy (or difficult) to add in a web-of-trust >style mechanism afterwards. However, of the two, it seems to me that this >idea has significantly lower barriers to full implementation in the short >term, which is why I bring it up. I think that web-of-trust model allows to get some benefits even when Nix builds are only a part of the computer's load. In that sense it gets lower barrier of entry for contributors. But maybe there are enough teams who do have full-time Nix build slaves… _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
