It's not strictly required, but it would mean losing out on all the binary packages provided by the CI. On 17 Jun 2016 20:54, "Yui Hirasawa" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> True, of course. But, there is a class of software projects which will > >>> likely never be "packaged" by package managers - namely, other package > >>> managers. Nix falls into this class, along with, for example, NPM, > >>> Brew, Oh-My-Zsh, and others. > >> > >> What reason would there to not package other package managers? > > > > IIRC, Debian won't package Nix because it violates the FHS (by requiring > a /nix > > directory). > > Is the nix root dir configurable? Would it be that horrible to have > /opt/nix or /var/lib/nix or something else be the nix root on Debian? > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
