On 08/27/2016 12:29 AM, Luca Bruno wrote: > +1 from me, @vcunat may know some drawbacks however
From my side it seems likely to fix more things than break; it was discussed on the PR. I just haven't had time to go through all/most potential nixpkgs references and fix them, etc. I also wanted every derivation to have foo.dev foo.lib etc. to simplify references instead of current lib.getLib foo, but I've had too little time/energy lately and it would require moving some logic from bash to nix. --Vladimir
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
