Ah that makes sense. I'm so used to Nix I just assume URLs with long
hash-looking things in them will always have the same contents. So would
the best solution be to update the rest of the package to match, and if
that doesn't work find the old patch instead?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Vladimír Čunát <vcu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/20/2016 09:52 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > Is GHC broken for anyone else? And if not, what makes my setup special?
> > Am I being redirected to the wrong patch url somehow?
> That feels like upstream updating the release tarball by applying some
nix-dev mailing list