Bumping the topic. Would be much much easier to use those kind of stuff if the situation is completely clear.
2016-10-02 7:49 GMT+01:00 Tim Cuthbertson <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > Thomasz recently asked about the Nix logo license, and when I searched I > noticed there had been another question about this a few months ago on the > mailing list (which I missed). > > Apologies for not addressing this sooner, I agree that we should be > explicit about the logo license. I'm happy to go along with pretty much > whatever the nix project prefers (CC-BY has already been suggested), and if > there's some official nix project entity which could be credited, I'd be > happy to assign copyright there too (so you could just credit e.g. the nix > foundation, not me specifically). > > @edolstra: are you happy with a CC-BY license for the logo? I'm holding > off from _actually_ declaring it yet in case you'd prefer to restrict > derivatives or something, but if I don't hear back from you within a week > I'll assume that CC-BY is fine :). And if you are happy with CC-BY, could > you go ahead and declare that on the website / repo somewhere so we have it > in writing for anyone else that comes looking? > > Cheers, > - Tim. > -- Tomasz Czyż
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
