Regarding the suid bit, why don't we let the program decide what suid should be applied to it's programs? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/22532
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 at 19:38 <da...@zarel.net> wrote: > On 2017-02-07 19:50, Tomasz Czyż wrote: > > David, > > > > I assume you are not talking about > > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/16485 [2]? > > In fact I'm talking about https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/16845 > :-) my mistake > > > Usually I'm using this kind of stuff as part of user session/desktop > > environment. > > Exactly, the actual screenlocker would be installed as a system package, > I thought it was okay because I noticed something like that was already > present in xfce.nix, but maybe we can adapt xfce4-session to accept a > new build input and change it so that it calls the screenlocker in the > nix store instead of calling the system package. > > With regards to slock: maybe we can ask the user to explicitly enable > the suid like we do when a user tries to install a non-free package? > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev