Also see the notes that Arian took during the BoF session at FOSDEM: We had a very spontaneous NixOS discussion panel at FOSDEM. > > I took minutes. I must say they're a bit rushy at times, so add stuff to > it > you think isn't clear or is lacking in content. Thanks! > > > http://piratepad.net/1nHg65LMQj >
2017-02-12 19:46 GMT+01:00 Thomas Hunger <tehun...@gmail.com>: > That would be amazing! I actually have an email sitting in my draft folder > proposing Nix Enhancement Proposals (NEPs). > > IMHO one of the things we aren't very good at is getting larger changes > merged or rejected. We attract a lot of smart people because Nix is pretty > awesome. These smart people then do substantial work, submit a PR and the > PR bitrots. This is highly demotivating. > > An RFC process would allow us to get to an accept / reject early on, with > the expectation that accepted RFCs will be merged when the technical work > is done. > > I'll add more specific comments to your PR. > > ~ > > On 12 February 2017 at 15:12, zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> we discussed of introducing a RFC process during FOSDEM. The goal is to >> help discussion for large or controversial changes which typically grind to >> a halt. >> >> Here is an initial proposal based on the one from the Rust community: >> https://github.com/zimbatm/rfcs/pull/1 . Please let me know what you >> think. >> >> Cheers, >> z >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nix-dev mailing list >> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev