On 14 February 2017 at 23:04, Bjørn Forsman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 February 2017 at 22:51, Domen Kožar <[email protected]> wrote: >> We need to use renames for backwards compatibility then :) > > A rename implies same signature under different namespace (AFAICS). > This is not the case here, because the option types are different. > > I've got a local change that is about to be pushed: > > + (mkRemovedOptionModule [ "security" "setuidOwners" ] "Use > security.wrappers instead") > + (mkRemovedOptionModule [ "security" "setuidPrograms" ] "Use > security.wrappers instead") > > (I also do some other fixups that was wrt. new security.wrapper to > make my NixOS build.)
I created PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/22806 Best regards, Bjørn Forsman _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
