Actually, very strange that such a huge change has no documentation changes at all.
Good thing is, there were some tests :) 2017-02-14 22:07 GMT+00:00 Bjørn Forsman <[email protected]>: > On 14 February 2017 at 23:04, Bjørn Forsman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 14 February 2017 at 22:51, Domen Kožar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We need to use renames for backwards compatibility then :) > > > > A rename implies same signature under different namespace (AFAICS). > > This is not the case here, because the option types are different. > > > > I've got a local change that is about to be pushed: > > > > + (mkRemovedOptionModule [ "security" "setuidOwners" ] "Use > > security.wrappers instead") > > + (mkRemovedOptionModule [ "security" "setuidPrograms" ] "Use > > security.wrappers instead") > > > > (I also do some other fixups that was wrt. new security.wrapper to > > make my NixOS build.) > > I created PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/22806 > > Best regards, > Bjørn Forsman > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > -- Tomasz Czyż
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
