There are some docs here: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/modules/security/wrappers/default.nix#L111
Though I agree that we should probably also add something to the manual about how to elevate privileges in NixOS. ~ On 14 February 2017 at 22:12, Tomasz Czyż <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, very strange that such a huge change has no documentation > changes at all. > > Good thing is, there were some tests :) > > 2017-02-14 22:07 GMT+00:00 Bjørn Forsman <[email protected]>: > >> On 14 February 2017 at 23:04, Bjørn Forsman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On 14 February 2017 at 22:51, Domen Kožar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We need to use renames for backwards compatibility then :) >> > >> > A rename implies same signature under different namespace (AFAICS). >> > This is not the case here, because the option types are different. >> > >> > I've got a local change that is about to be pushed: >> > >> > + (mkRemovedOptionModule [ "security" "setuidOwners" ] "Use >> > security.wrappers instead") >> > + (mkRemovedOptionModule [ "security" "setuidPrograms" ] "Use >> > security.wrappers instead") >> > >> > (I also do some other fixups that was wrt. new security.wrapper to >> > make my NixOS build.) >> >> I created PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/22806 >> >> Best regards, >> Bjørn Forsman >> _______________________________________________ >> nix-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >> > > > > -- > Tomasz Czyż > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
