Hi, I found from my old notes that I ended up using simavr before anyway... so I've now compiled that instead, although the examples and tests gave me grief so I rm -r themand put a dummy Makefile in the directory. Not tested it with my code yet.
cheers, Nawal On 3 March 2017 at 07:35, Bjørn Forsman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 March 2017 at 00:27, Nawal Husnoo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to build simulavr, using the script below. However, it's not > > finding *binutils-2.27/lib/libbfd.so > > > > > > bfd search- > > /nix/store/43cpb15i8jjing1gwn8rmbg80lhl8kqv-binutils-2.27/lib/libbfd.la > in > > "include" and ""... no > > configure: error: > > Could not locate libbfd.so/libbfd.a and/or bfd.h. > > > > > > But it's possible to have it installed: > > > > $ ls /nix/store/*binutils*/lib/libbfd* > > /nix/store/2mvblw8kq86ncaidjrp3x4rssy1lhlhi-binutils-2.27/lib/libbfd-2. > 27.so > > /nix/store/2mvblw8kq86ncaidjrp3x4rssy1lhlhi-binutils-2.27/lib/libbfd.la > > /nix/store/2mvblw8kq86ncaidjrp3x4rssy1lhlhi-binutils-2.27/lib/libbfd.so > > /nix/store/b7sf8p9fgjlrwr1ndwvwdy71lfnn02pv-binutils-2.27-lib/lib/libbf > d-2.27.so > > /nix/store/b7sf8p9fgjlrwr1ndwvwdy71lfnn02pv-binutils-2.27-lib/lib/libbf > d.la > > /nix/store/b7sf8p9fgjlrwr1ndwvwdy71lfnn02pv-binutils-2.27-lib/lib/ > libbfd.so > > /nix/store/cwxfpjwr4fp6mhyfc46pj0apy4w4dwyr-binutils-2.27-lib/lib/libbf > d-2.27.so > > /nix/store/cwxfpjwr4fp6mhyfc46pj0apy4w4dwyr-binutils-2.27-lib/lib/libbf > d.la > > /nix/store/cwxfpjwr4fp6mhyfc46pj0apy4w4dwyr-binutils-2.27-lib/lib/ > libbfd.so > > /nix/store/j1myzr7f9139kckijcy6yqv4l62vml8j-binutils-2.27-lib/lib/libbf > d-2.27.so > > /nix/store/j1myzr7f9139kckijcy6yqv4l62vml8j-binutils-2.27-lib/lib/libbf > d.la > > /nix/store/j1myzr7f9139kckijcy6yqv4l62vml8j-binutils-2.27-lib/lib/ > libbfd.so > > I had the same problem in 2014[1]. Didn't solve it :-) > > According to "./configure --help", the binutils package needs to be > the one cross-compiled for AVR. > > Do you know how simulavr compares to simavr? simulavr seems pretty > dead, whereas simavr maintainer just put out a release. Or is simulavr > simply "completed"? > > [1]: https://github.com/bjornfor/nixpkgs/tree/avr-stuff > > Best regards, > Bjørn Forsman >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
