On 17-03-24 03:18pm, Marc Weber wrote:
> Issue pulseSupport -> does it make sense to have a global 'enable pulse
> for all packgages' config.pulseSupport = true flag?
>
> packages could be using: config.pulseSupport or false to disable by
> default then.
>
> Having a defaultFlags = {
> config.sox = null; # does this cause the package default being used in
> "config.sox or false" ?
> config.pulseSupport = null; # please note: you can enable, but most
> packages will work with pulse without doing so
> config.qtSupport = null;
> config.gtkSupport = null;
In my opinion baking global implicit state into nixpkgs
is not a good idea.
--
Proudly written in Mutt with Vim on NixOS.
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: http://five.sentenc.es
May take up to five days to read your message. If it’s urgent, call me.
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
