On 09/04/17 11:13, Florent Becker wrote:
Moreover, many of the merged pull requests [2] also have failed CI. It
looks like the failed CI signal nothing to the people who do merge.
Everybody just knows that CI is broken and its success or failure
means nothing. Is it so?
Failure means nothing, but success means the changes are not (too)
broken. So it's not quite useless.
Some failures are meaningful. It only takes a quick glance to tell if
the failure is some kind of bustage or a real issue.
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
