Well, if the only issue is it being far from completion, [1] should be a working implementation of it, with all the features if I remember correctly.
However, I must say I've been putting more attention on the RFC than on the implementation lately, waiting to be sure the RFC is OK before making the last adjustments, especially a long-due rebase :) That said, you said "define volumes with an OS image (not NixOS)", which would imply neither this module nor [2] pointed out by Volth actually is a good choice for you. Unfortunately, I don't know (yet?) of a module that would allow you to do what you are looking for. Leo Gaspard / Ekleog [1] https://github.com/Ekleog/nixpkgs/tree/vms [2] https://github.com/Nekroze/kvms.nix On 05/16/2017 06:29 PM, Justin Humm wrote: > Thanks for the hint. I've already seen this, and it is quite exactly > what I want, but I considered it too far away from completion for my use > case. > > Does anyone use declarative VMs right now? > > Best, > Justin > > > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > https://mailman.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl https://mailman.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
