On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Graham Christensen <[email protected]> wrote: > This is part of my inclination of not really loving PR#10851, it is > complicated and goes around the normal proceses, even when we can easily > deploy fairly quickly.
The problem that I have with the current solutions is that they involve _user_ actions (*), they do not address all uses cases, and potentially a lot of local recompilation time. PR#10851 goals are to address all of these issues. >From the _maintainer_ point-of-view, this would be as simple as a cherry-pick (*). >From the user point of view, this would be like any ordinary channel. >From hydra point of view, this would be only rebuilding packages which have patches, or which are statically linked. (*) goes around the normal processes. -- Nicolas Pierron http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolasbpierron - http://nbp.name/ _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
